EU-NATO-USA: ALLIANCE OF THE CENTURY for global domination Rick Rozoff
© Stop NATO, 2009 
With the reintegration of France to NATO's military command after a break of 33 years, which will be formalized this year 's at the NATO summit in Strasbourg, is also updated the Strategic Concept of 1999 with greater emphasis sull'integrzione NATO-EU-US military. Intensified by the Union To create a European rapid deployment of forces, 60,000 troops, their battle groups and their members for use in the Nordic countries in the world, we urgently need a revision resulting from the mutual relations between the three main centers of Western economic power, political and military - the EU, NATO and the United States.
* The development of military capabilities ever more ambitious competition with NATO, if not a challenge direct the Agency and the transatlantic strategic alliance with Washington.
* NATO is an antidote multilaterale, all'unilateralismo degli Stati Uniti.
* L'UE è un professionista, sulla base dei principi di pace, mentre la diplomazia degli Stati Uniti e della NATO sono spesso troppo veloci perché si basano sulla necessità militare.
* L'UE è un concorrente o anche il principale concorrente degli Stati Uniti in Europa e sempre più in tutto il mondo.
Ognuno può credere alle mezogne quanto vuole, ma le parole e le azioni dei responsabili politici e dei funzionari incaricati di imporre la politica estera dell' UE, Nato e Usa, sono sempre controverse.
21 dei 27 Stati membri dell'UE sono anche membri della NATO. Dei sei che non lo sono, tutti, ad eccezione di Cipro (per ora) - Austria, Finland, Ireland, Malta and Sweden - were members of the Programme of Cooperation for Peace and NATO. Over the past five years, Malta was only a small military contingent serving under NATO in Afghanistan, the Balkans or elsewhere.
Of the 26 NATO member states, only Norway, the United States, Canada and Iceland, the last three are not in Europe and thus do not benefit because they are not in the European Union.
The three crucial players may occasionally "quibble" about the tactical, technical and timing of secondary importance but are held together with regard to responsible and strategic concerns.
The EU and NATO members were openly military members since 1992, when they signed the "Berlin Plus" agreement on the sharing of joint military activities. Even
EU states not yet members of NATO are concerned the subordination of the continent for the block in the Charter of the Strategic Alliance of 1999, still in force, states that the nuclear arsenals of the United States, in particular, but also of the United Kingdom and France, "are essential to preserve peace" and are "an essential element of political and military link between European and American members of the Alliance."
As the events of 1989-1991 led to the collapse of order after the Second World War in Europe and the world, the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact and Council for Mutual Economic Assistance (Comecon) the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the violent fragmentation of Yugoslavia, make that the major Western powers to resume immediately the plans for world domination stopped after the two world wars and, after learning from his actions, most recently set up a building to share the loot from around the world, not only the host of its former colonies, territories, protectorates and mandates, but the parts of the world than ever before had at its disposal, including the former Soviet Union.
This confirms a statement by NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, for almost four years
NATO and the European Union are making enough progress in the coordination of modern military capabilities. I am optimistic that we can expand our cooperation in other areas where we have a security policy, where we can complement and reinforce our mutual commitment. And that is ... functional areas such as the Caucasus and Central Asia. "(The NATO International, March 31, 2005). Two months after the Secretary of State.
Nicholas Burns, who arrived in the place, having been U.S. ambassador to NATO, he used a 'similar formula:" to have welcomed please 's invitation by the Secretary General of NATO, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, the alliance el' European Union to strengthen cooperation to ensure the security of NATO beyond the borders in Europe, Africa and Central Asia. "(Associated Press, May 26, 2005)
Burns explained the proposal of division of labor, at least from the perspective of Washington:
" Let's see if we get it. NATO carries out the major military operations, and manages the EU's peacekeeping operations ... "
Meanwhile, in April 2005, the then German Defence Minister Peter Struck, speaking at a European conference on security in Berlin, stressed the point, saying that" It would be wrong to see the development of European defense capability separately on the progress within NATO, and added that both NATO and the European Union are struggling to be the best prepared for missions outside of the area in an attempt to adapt to rapid change in security. "(Deutsche Welle, April 13, 2005)
In other words, the EU and NATO have determined that all but the western hemisphere, which presumably belongs to the United States (although there were still members of NATO participate individually, separately and collectively) to participate in a hunt for military deployments.
Another round quality to the international situation after 1991, and a return to the times of colonial ambitions and pretensions of the West, the diplomacy of the cannon and guns pointed against the "natives subversive".
In reality, the era of post-Cold War is essentially a return to Europe, the West in general and much of the world in terms of influence of the NATO member states not only to the status quo ante, before the Second World War, but further back to 1800 and the flowering of colonial expansion European Union.
Indeed, if not formally the major Western powers have created modern equivalent of the Congress of Vienna of 1815 and the Congress of Berlin in 1878.
The first took place towards the end of the Napoleonic wars, with the imminent defeat of Napoleon at Waterloo and established the foundation of the Holy Alliance and the new order that is to be ensured is that the throne of Europe will never be again threatened by the republicanism.
The second model, that of the Congress of Berlin, was the opening to redraw borders in the Balkans and the beginning of the dispute, and the race start for Africa, which will be launched in earnest six years later in At the Berlin Conference.
similarities between then and the current period do not require much comment, as they are obvious. 
The Berlin conference, attended by representatives of Austria-Hungary, Belgium, Britain, Denmark, France, Italy, Netherlands, Portugal, Prussia, Spain, Norway and Sweden, opened across Africa, particularly the Congo River basin and the Great Lakes is the most brutal and cynical looting and robbery.
He is also a common prototype for military attacks and economic groups, Western Europeans, virtually defenseless against the nations, who have not had time to be replicated in China in 1900 invaded by military forces of Austria-Hungary, Britain, France , Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia and the United States to suppress the Boxer Rebellion and Western economic interests.
To demonstrate how the past is now present, in an article written in common, HDI Times of London last June, George Robertson and Paddy Ashdown, is discussed below, nno has stated that "the multilateral co-operation in Europe ... implies more cooperation for the defense if you want to be taken seriously. The impulse to create battle groups of the EU should be accelerated, consistent with the reaction forces of NATO, should form the basis of a European capacity for emerging capable of operating in so-called "failed states and post-conflict environments." (The Times, June 12, 2008)
The document, in fact, a clear call to action for the military elite West, also includes the observation that "... This is essential if we are called to extend the authority of some non-government sector, that globalization is helping to generate."
The article culminates in this analysis, rude and just as revealing:
"For the first time in more than 200 years we are moving towards a world that is not totally dominated by the 'West. If we want to influence this environment rather than being extorted money from it, if it is assumed that there are some worrying features of globalization, multilateralism, practical, is a strategic necessity ... "Anyone in
world, believes that the desire of the great Western powers and their ruling class to take, gather and expand the global domination, is a necessity, the plan is very strategic. Unlike
of obscure academic digressions that reshape the world and its national divisions in the quiet of their minds and sit comfortably in the chairs of the university library, the statement in The Times appeared because their authors are anything but not some abstract theoretical, historical or political philosophers. They are important architects and executors of the relentless category they belong to, both marked by the post-war (Cold War), or as they themselves the present the post-modern laboratory, which were the Balkans in the 90s. Lord George Robertson is Secretary of Defense and British baron.
Port Ellen is secretary general of NATO from 1999 to 2004, succeeding Javier Solana, who has become a High Representative for Common Foreign and Security and the Secretary General of the 'European Union and the Western European Union. In fact, the foreign minister of democratic values.
Paddy Ashdown was the international High Representative for Bosnia-Herzegovina from September 2002 until May 2006, with apparent arbitrariness, despotism, and ferocity that earned him the title of Viceroy of informal another era, almost without doubt, because his father was an officer in the British colonial service in India, the mission and style of Ashdown son not only evoked the colonial past, but it is emblematic of its current revival.
For nearly four years, the International Commission on the Balkans, based - among others - from the U.S. Marshall Fund of Germany, issued a fierce critic of the policies of the EU and the United Nations in the Balkans.
"The Commission argues that democracy has been stifled in Bosnia "on the part of 'coercive authority" of Paddy Ashdown, High Representative for the EU.
"The international representatives, the Committee said," dabble in social engineering, " but they are not held accountable if their policies have failed. If the neo-colonial regime is rooted in Europe, encourage economic discontent ...'" (International Herald Tribune, April 29, 2005)
As a reward for this, a year ago, Ashdown has been promoted as the successor of 'former head of its father in the Indian subcontinent, to know what the press at the time called the "super envoy" for Afghanistan, a document that describes in these terms:
"The proposed role would mean that Lord Ashdown is what will unify the efforts of NATO and the United Nations in Afghanistan. It is believed that NATO officials sostegono his candidacy for this has an exceptional power "(The Telegraph, December 6, 2007).
The Afghan government has proved less enthusiastic about the role of Ashdown in the Western press, and has not given the job, showing temperament 'pre-modern' of Afghan people. The adjective will be explained later.
Ashdown has stated that the Afghan government or the government knew before, was the 'post-modern' 's former British diplomat Cardinal Richelieu to Louis XVIII and Tony Blair on Foreign Affairs, Robert Cooper. The eminence grise in question is the author of two books: "The Post-Modern State and the World Order" (The post-modern state and world order 2000) and "The Breaking of Nations: Order and Chaos in the Twenty-First Century" (The rupture of Nations: Order and chaos in the twenty-first century 2003), and has contributed a version of the first series, "Re-Ordering the World: The Long-Term Implications of September 11 "(Re-Ordering the World: The long-term implications of September 11).
Cooper has been characterized as the father of the "new liberal imperialism" and was for a short period of Tony Blair's special representative in Afghanistan after the 2001 invasion.
As Robertson and Ashdown, has played a role in enforcement and in developing strategies and rationalizations of imperial policies.
His first book, "The condition post-moderna e l'ordine mondiale", ha diviso il mondo in tre nazioni: pre-moderno, moderna e post-moderna, non differenti essenzialmente, anche se superficialmente nello stile di quelli dei loro antenati colonialisti per dividere i popoli e le nazioni del mondo in civilizzato e non civilizzato.
Varianti di questa visione del mondo sono riapparse in tutto l'Occidente dopo la fine della Guerra Fredda, e il nuovo ordine internazionale che ne è seguito lasciassero da parte le mezze promesse di rispettare la recente maggioranza dell'umanità liberata, spesso con culture autentiche e molto più antiche e molto più venerabili che quella dei loro antichi padroni coloniali e alleati usa.
Dopo Ashdown ha rifiutato la possibilità to continue the family tradition in Afghanistan, working as right hand man, Javier Solana and General Director of Politico-Military Affairs and the General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union, a position he still retains.
Cooper also believes that played a decisive role in European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP, in short), initially introduced as a European identity in security and defense at the meeting of NATO foreign ministers in Berlin in 1996 where it was agreed that the Western European Union (WEU) will oversee the creation within the structures of NATO.
The ESDP is now effectively run by the High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Council of the European Union, Javier Solana, whose leader Cooper is a lieutenant. The ESDP was first tested on the ground in Macedonia in 2003, when NATO and has remained the main arm of defense of the armed forces of the European Union.
Macedonia, the second victim of the NATO war against Yugoslavia in 1999, was the prototype for the representation from the European Union occupation forces and interdiction of NATO and the former succeeded to EUFOR mission Concord ' Operation Allied Harmony in the latter.
In 2004, NATO once again delivered a protectorate in Bosnia, as part of the Stabilisation Force (SFOR) for the EU and EUFOR Althea.
In 2008, NATO began the transition of command of the Kosovo Force (KFOR), and permitted only in accordance with UN Resolution 1244, the Mission Governatica the Law of the EU (EULEX), causing severe sentences for Serbia and Russia.
Last November, NATO has given the wide maritime interdiction operation of EUNAVFOR Atalanta in the Gulf of Aden and the Horn of Africa to the European Union, which has been described as "something completely new for the European Union because it takes place far from Europe itself ... HRFOR Atalanta is an ambitious project. The area of \u200b\u200bsea, which must be controlled is enormous ... "(Radio Netherlands, November 21 2008)
The "civilizing mission" of the joint project 'EU and NATO in areas not covered in the pre-modern and modern grows steadily.
During this month, Giampaolo Di Paola, Chairman of NATO's Military Committee, declined in the triadic mission details on the global US-NATO-EU, implying the need for a new form of global governance in which NATO, the 'EU and other international organizations should play an important role. "(AND Kronos International [Italy], February 13, 2009)
is worth examining in depth the nature of global government to say who are the self-appointed guardians.
Officials in Brussels and Washington calling for regular The term "international community" when it suits them and with the same regularity ignore the will of the true community of nations, when the connviene.
The population of all 27 EU member states is less than 500 million, less than one twelfth of mankind.
If NATO to include data that are not members of the European Union - United States of America whose inhabitants 300,000,000 representing 40% of the community of 'EU, Canada, Norway and Iceland, the total is just over 800,000,000, less than one-seventh of 'humanity.
The main countries of the 'EU and European members of NATO are former colonial powers - Britain, France, Spain, Portugal, Netherlands and Denmark, and the second largest contingent of 'a place in the sun' in Belgium, Italy and Germany.
Starting with trade missions, which soon became monopolies, including shortly after military outposts, and finally an economic subjugation, political and military value, the major Western powers were handed out large portions of territory in Asia, Africa, North, Central and South America and Oceania all sectors and their respective spheres of influence.
Many member states of NATO and the European Union still maintain the guise of the struggle for the world, especially abroad and in other domains are not contiguous, particularly the islands, seized the indigenous inhabitants.
Britain, France, Holland, Spagna, Portogallo, Danimarca e Stati Uniti sono in questa categoria.
Sono gli Stati Uniti quelli che proibiscono ad altri, anche in ambito europeo, il diritto di esercitare influenza in territori che sono stati parte integrali del loro paese, durante vari secoli, come la Serbia con Kosovo e la Russia con l'Ucraina.
I principali paesi occidentali sono stati anche i responsabili del traffico di schiavi africani, la più grande migrazione forzata di persone nella storia umana, con stime di trasporto attraverso l'Oceano Atlantico, che vanno da 10 a 30 milioni nel corso dei secoli XVI e XIX.
Tra i partecipanti, da un lato o dall'altro dell'oceano, spesso in entrambi, Gran Bretagna, Francia, Spagna. Portogallo, Olanda, Danimarca and the United States later.
One of the tacit foundations of the transatlantic community.
terms and concepts obsolete and no longer value as the "White Man's Charge, the Manifest Destiny," a place in the sun "Lebensraum [living space] and" empire where the sun never sets "have been abandoned, but not the underlying vision of the world geopolitical and objects that are causing them and their place in other forms have been redesigned in the last generation.
military forces have returned to Western nations that have believed to be rid of them ever, for example, British troops have returned to Afghanistan, Iraq and Sierra Leone, the French in Haiti, returning the bicentenary of its independence from France and Côte d'Ivoire, U.S. forces are back in the Philippines.
not just a sum of individual actions of Western powers allies that has emerged, but a systematic link with international implementations planned and coordinated with specific and broad geo-strategic objectives.
Despite the much-publicized differences of opinion regarding the invasion of Iraq in 2003, all 26 NATO members have sent military personnel to neighboring Iraq and Kuwait as part of the training mission, NATO in Iraq.
Less than two years after the invasion, the 'Alliance has announced that "NATO's goal is to train This year 1,000 security officers and medium-high "and" The European Union has decided to train some 700 judges, prosecutors and prison guards. '(San Francisco Chronicle, March 21, 2005)
Then, in 2005, the then U.S. ambassador to NATO, Victoria Nuland, former security advisor now former Vice President Dick Cheney said: "We need to eliminate once and for all the rivalry, some real, some imaginary, between the EU and NATO. "
His comments were characterized by a military siege on the Internet, claiming that "NATO and the European Union (EU) should establish a dialogue much deeper than in the past to address the wide range of military issues, political, equipment, financing before the transatlantic security community ... "(Defense News, September 23, 2005)
The first U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan after the invasion of 2001, James Dobbins, who was then director of the Center for International Security Policy and Defence Policy at the Rand Corporation, reflects a similar attitude to the press that "the time has come, therefore, to stop asking what it can do for NATO, the EU, and start asking what the EU can do for NATO. And the 'Afghanistan is the place to start. This could be done in a better way trialaterale with a dialogue between NATO, the European Union European Union and the United States "(International Herald Tribune, September 30, 2005).
To prove the triangle even better EU-NATO-US, only concern the events on the European continent, a month after the observations of Dobbins, Julianne Smith, deputy director programs to international security think tank the U.S. Center for Strategic International Studies, complains in a conference by that body:
"Yes, consult to the Balkans, but not enough. NATO and the EU should speak of non-proliferation, the Caucasus, Ukraine, and Moldova - the whole affair. "(Defense News, October 14, 2005.) Klaus Naumann, former head of NATO's Military Committee, spoke at a conference and revealed that what was sought was to deplore that "Europe was again haunted by the ghosts of sovereignty" with what he wanted to say that the love for their country and people is an obstacle to further consolidate the domain dell'Otan and the EU in Europe and beyond.
A month later, Javier Solana, former NATO Secretary General, said the expansion plans of military installations and the European Union's global action plans "have not had to deal with the replacement of NATO," instead "to become a stronger player, more capable, and a better partner for the United States," citing the Balkans, as the original testing ground for the triumvirate, "Through our concerted efforts with the United States and NATO ..." (Defense News, 10 November 2005)
The following month the said Klaus Naumann wrote an editorial that contains the statement that "... L 'EU should take measures to improve their ability to conduct operations. A new battle group of the EU must be strengthened through regular training and certification, preferably using NATO standards ... "(Daily Times [Pakistan], 1 December 2005)
The article states that "the two agencies should expand their strategic dialogue beyond their current focus on the Balkans and Afghanistan" included the same recommendation made previously by Julianne Smith of the EU and NATO, "must manage all their intrusion into other areas, including regions such as Ukraine or Moldova."
The integration of military and foreign policy of 'EU and NATO continues at a rapid pace over the years, reached its climax at the NATO Summit in Bucharest, Romania, in April last year.
At this summit, "the U.S. Permanent Representative to NATO, Victoria Nuland, said that the key to the strengthening of NATO was to build a stronger European Union." ("Der Spiegel", 1st April 2008 )
a period of the host informs país que "has a high responsable afirmado Recientemente estadounidense que, lejos a ser considerada como amenaza para la OTAN, European politics de Seguridad y Defensa (ESDP) consolidada es necesidad inmediata a ..." (Nine O'Clock News, March 31, 2008] A newspaper of the host country, reported that "a senior U.S. said recently that," far from being regarded as a threat to NATO, the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP) is an immediate need and consolidated ... "(Nine O'Clock News, March 31, 2008]
The EU Presidency is in the hands of France last year and French President Nicolas Sarkozy has been the main proponent axis EU-US-NATO Summit in Bucharest.
Although not its only proponent:
"The U.S. president, George W. Bush supports the idea that Europe must strengthen its defense capabilities, said French President Nicolas Sarkozy, describing him as" a decisive moment in history. "Bush's support for a 'Europe of defense," as he described the involvement of Sarkozy was expressed at a summit of NATO leaders in Bucharest ... "(Deutsche Presse-Agentur, 3 April 2008)
Bush's speech at the summit said that "NATO is no longer a 'static alliance ... is now a' alliance that sent its forces around the world ..." (USA Today, April 1 2008).
His speech also contains complaints and routine application of the law after the Second World War [1945-1991] in Europe, saying: "I said that Europe must withdraw the bitter legacy of Yalta, and remove false boundaries that divided the continent for too long. "
A Romanian news source informed on the relations between the EU and the United States during the summit, saying that" The quality of transatlantic cooperation through a profound transformation, adaptation to new conditions after the Cold War and the preparation of a new type of global cooperation. " (Nine O'Clock News, April 3, 2008)
The same source cited earlier days before reports that the former Rumanian Foreign Minister, Mircea Geoana, said that "it is desirable that the purpose of this summit is to bring about a new covenant ... of the century." (Nine O'Clock News, April 2, 2008)
Two weeks after the end of the summit, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said, warning that NATO is intended to usurp the role and functions of the United Nations ". .. And "an attempt to form a union in the world with a Western core that wants to say almost all functions of the United Nations. "(Interfax, April 17, 2008)
with France as the main intermediary, the Presidency of the European Union announced its intention to join with the military command of NATO, and has accelerated in recent years, the impetus for a symbiosis EU-NATO-US military.
An agency dispatch from the title "France preaches defense of 'the EU, a key element for the future of NATO, the French Defence Minister Herve Morin boasted of wanting to" strengthen the military capabilities of the European Union, a prerequisite because France is fully reintegrate with NATO. " (Agence France-Presse, November 10, 2008)
Morin gave the idea of \u200b\u200bthe pace of military buildup 'in a meeting of EU defense ministers of the EU (for the most part members of the EU and NATO), stated: " I can say that from 10 November ... we un progresso sostanziale econsiderevole, probabilmente, per quanto è accaduto negli ultimi 10 anni. "
Allo stesso tempo, Jean-Francois Bureau, vice segretario generale della NATO per la diplomazia pubblica, ha detto, "Ventuno dei 27 paesi dell'UE sono anche membri della NATO, ed entrambe le organizzazioni di 'consigli sono attivi in questi scenari di conflitto .
"Dal punto di vista della NATO, non vi è un bisogno di ulteriore cooperazione" con l'UE in campo militare. "(United Press International, 12 novembre 2008)
La stessa notizia menziona il fatto che, come in Iraq, l'Unione Europea sta formando il personale della sicurezza in Afghanistan.
Nel dicembre dello scorso anno, il European Council stated the objective of strengthening the EU security and defense [ESDP] to "strengthen the strategic cooperation between the EU and NATO ..." (Irish Times, December 11, 2008)
The source added: "EU leaders are also willing to adopt a declaration on strengthening the capacity of the European Security and Defence [CSDP], setting new targets to ensure that the ' EU to deploy 60,000 soldiers in 60 days and thousands of civilian personnel in at least a dozen simultaneous missions. "
Another report of plans for a rapid reaction force of 60,000 soldiers, said that EU leaders issued a joint statement which "have riconosciuto la necessità di rafforzare e ottimizzare le capacità di difesa d'Europa e si sono impegnati a lavorare di più in stretta collaborazione con la NATO " (Deutsche Presse-Agentur, 12 dicembre 2008)
In un altro rapporto dello stesso giorno, il presidente francese Nicolas Sarkozy ha parafrasato, affermando che "US non vede più la politica della PESD come un' aggressione contro la NATO, e sia il presidente uscente, George W. come il presidente entrante Barack Obama appoggiano la politica dell'UE".
E lo ha ribadito dicendo: "Non vi è una scelta tra gli Stati Uniti e la PESD. I due vanno insieme. "
(EUobserver, 12 dicembre 2008)
Il 9 dicembre, il ministro degli Esteri Britain, David Miliband and French Foreign Minister, Bernard Kouchner, have signed, all together, an article that included the confirmation of the EU's role in increasing the war and U.S. military and NATO in the south of the Caucasus and substitutability of roles NATO and the EU: "The European Union has sent more than 200 civilian observers to Georgia. They arrived in a few weeks before the start of hostilities ...
" No such thing as an army European, non c ' NATO is not an army. "
"There are national forces, which are used as needed, both in Europe and in the NATO." (United Kingdom Foreign and Commonwealth Office, December 9, 2008)
In preparation for the summit of the 60th anniversary of NATO on 3-4 April in Strasbourg and Kehl, this month, leaders of both host countries, French President Nicholas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angela Merkel, published a commentary in Le Monde, explaining that joint action requires cooperation and greater integration between the EU and NATO.
the annual security conference in Monaco of Bavaria since 7 February, the British Foreign Secretary David Miliband has called for a clause on the defense (war) of NATO, at the same time pressed for a 'tighter integration of the EU and the policies and actions of the EU and NATO:
"The NATO provides a commitment to collective defense. The guarantees of Article 5 of the integrated military structures for each of our allies to ensure that their borders are inviolable. "(United Kingdom Foreign & Commonwealth Office, February 7, 2009)
The speech of U.S. Vice President , Joe Biden, on the occasion of the conference was played by an 'important German source as follows:
"The Americans will be extremely careful that the confrontation with Tehran is not developing in a battle of' one against the other between the U.S. and Iran. "The message from Biden Monaco of Bavaria is as follows: Each country in NATO and each member of the European Union are involved, starting today. It's the price for the new opening and transatlantic cooperation. "(Der Spiegel, February 9, 2009)
Namely, all the states of NATO with the U.S. are obliged under the provisions of Article 5 (the article was invoked and implemented after September 9, 2001) and the European Union is now so inextricably intertwined with NATO, which will not only continue to follow the policy and actions of NATO, but also the individuality of the U.S..
With New Year, the Czech Republic took over the presidency of the European Union.
In a statement, Vondra called the unity of the 'EU and NATO in the face of Russia's prime minister (...)", Czech Republic Alexandr Vondra added, has organized support for installing the radar of the U.S. missile shield in his country, saying that "Europeans and Americans need to get the same level of protection ..... so it is important to develop missile defense system. " (Deutsche Presse-Agentur, February 7, 2009)
not hard to see how things are going: the EU is integrated with NATO to the point of merging the military policies, programs, security and foreign policy with the Alliance and the United States because it is not only a member, but the central foundation of NATO, the EU is also closely linked, and made subordinate to Washington.
Three days ago, the House majority leader of the United States, Nancy Pelosi,
was in Italy, where he un'appello not just to his guest, but to the whole of Europe with regard to the Afghan war, saying that "We must make a decision ... and I mean us, Italy, EU, U.S., and NATO, all of us, as it is a function of our national security interests ..." (Agence France-Presse, 16 February 2009)
Two days later, Italy announced it would deploy more troops in Afghanistan.
Western powers, united under the banner of NATO arrogate to themselves the prerogative to intervene in regional and internal affairs of nations in worldwide and the exclusive right to use military force beyond its borders.
Even if they speak of "coverage" of the U.S. when it can be used against a nation under attack to justify a war or before or after the fact, managers do not see any role for organizations like the Non-Aligned Movement of 114 states , the 'African Union of 53 nations, the Organization of American States of 33 members, 23 members of the Arab League, the Organization of Islamic Conference of 57 nations, the Commonwealth of Independent States post-Soviet era, the' Treaty Organization Collective Security, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization or Associazionde of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Non per affrontare temi globali o anche un ruolo dirigente in questioni regionali e locali che riguardano direttamente ai rispettivi gruppi e membri che la conformano.
Tre giorni fa, in occasione di una riunione del Parlamento Europeo, urgeva che l'UE fosse più integrata con la NATO.
Ari Vatanen, un membro in rappresentanza Francia, è stato uno di quelli accusati di questo e disse, tra le altre cose, tra le altre cose, che l'Unione Europea può solo raggiungere il suo pieno potenziale attraverso lo sviluppo di un forte legame transatlantico e un rapporto di complementarietà con la NATO ". Al quale il membro tedesco del Parlamento europeo, Tobias Pflüger, ha risposto: "Ogni sforzo per rafforzare la NATO attraverso closer cooperation with the European Union increases the potential for international conflicts. It will also lead to a further militarization of EU foreign policy and accelerate the tendency to use military force to 'solve' the conflict. "(European Parliament, 17 dfebbraio 2009)
Vatanen Pflüger's positions and not only opposed but mutually exclusive in the sense that none can accept others as they are the only alternatives. There is no neutral ground or a third alternative.
Europe and the world can agree on domination of a military bloc in increasingly aggressive expansion, the first in history, or it may organize attivamente per smantellarlo.
Ci dovrete scusare se riformuliamo l'acronimo della NATO come "Ordine Teutonico Ariano-nordico"
© Copyright Rick Rozoff, Stop NATO, 2009
Fonte:http://www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=12348
With the reintegration of France to NATO's military command after a break of 33 years, which will be formalized this year 's at the NATO summit in Strasbourg, is also updated the Strategic Concept of 1999 with greater emphasis sull'integrzione NATO-EU-US military. Intensified by the Union To create a European rapid deployment of forces, 60,000 troops, their battle groups and their members for use in the Nordic countries in the world, we urgently need a revision resulting from the mutual relations between the three main centers of Western economic power, political and military - the EU, NATO and the United States. 
Until now, generally accepted in the environment of the establishment consists largely of a series of four false dichotomies: 
U.S. Citizens for Peace & Justice - Rome 
will be put in place special measures of security will be defined as a red zone, will develop a list of citizens, there will be a new video surveillance system. 
Negli Stati Uniti sia i Repubblicani che i Democratici vedono la trasformazione della vecchia NATO in questa nuova alleanza militare offensiva come una buona idea (neocon) per promuovere nel mondo gli interessi americani and those of their close allies such as Israel. It is not only an idea actively promoted by the neocon Bush-Cheney, but also by the neoconservative advisers to both 2008 American presidential candidates, John McCain and Sen. Barack Obama. In fact, both candidates enthusiastically support the military intervention, and this is mainly because their advisers are from the same neo-conservative environment. 
McCain (standing right) shortly before his capture by the Vietnamese in 1967: a heroic warrior. 
Machetera The author is a member of Tlaxcala, the network of translators for linguistic diversity. This article may be reprinted as long as the content and integrity are cited authors, translators, editors and source. 
